Receiver Hitch options
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree6Likes
  • 1 Post By Artillian
  • 2 Post By rtgt
  • 3 Post By Artillian

Thread: Receiver Hitch options

  1. Top | #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Online
    08-11-2019 @ 08:38 PM
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    311
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 51 Times in 36 Posts

    Receiver Hitch options

    It looks like there are two options for a hitch receiver. The 2300 lb. frame (73 lb.) with the receiver hitch adapter (38 lb.) or the 3000 lb. frame (91 lb.) with the built in receiver. I have a 410 loader so I guess from the chart on the website either frame would be OK. I think I'd rather lose a few lbs. capacity and have the heavier 3000 lb. frame with the hitch receiver built in rather than have to have a separate adapter. Am I correct that the forks are the same for both frames?
    Am I looking at the correct figures and what do others think is the best option for handling trailers with a loader. Would it be a mistake to consider the heavier frame on a loader that can only lift less than 1000 lbs. I'm just thinking that I'd probably use the hitch more often than the forks.
    2005 - JD 4110, 54" front blade, 47" snow blower
    2004 - JD X595, 54" front blade
    2000 - JD 4100, 410 FEL

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to eastcreek For This Useful Post:

    Artillian (02-24-2016)

  3. Remove Advertisements
    GreenTractorTalk.com
    Advertisements
     

  4. Top | #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:20 AM
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,269
    Thanks
    71
    Thanked 174 Times in 161 Posts
    If your loader is only rated to lift 1000lbs or less you will be fine with the 2300lb rated adapter. You will be surprised at what you will use the forks for, so don't sell your self short on those. How big of a trailer are you wanting to move?

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to 69project For This Useful Post:

    Artillian (02-24-2016)

  6. Top | #3
    Captain Hook Kennyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:13 PM
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    16,241
    Thanks
    4,992
    Thanked 4,031 Times in 2,511 Posts
    Any intentions of ever upgrading to a 3-series? If not get the regular frame-just my opinion.
    Kenny

    -John Deere 3720 Deluxe Cab TLB
    FEL, MMM, Artillian 42" Forks and Modular Grapple, I-Match, Ballast Box, and lots of other STUFF.
    -John Deere 455 w/60" MMM


    Bolt on Grab Hooks and other cool stuff are now for sale!!

    Visit our YouTube Channel

    My Equipment:
    John Deere 3720 Deluxe Cab, 300cx FEL, 366 Front Blade, 59" Front Snowblower, Ballast Box
    Artillian 3K Forks, Grapple, Front-Hoe Bucket
    John Deere 455, 60" MMM

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Kennyd For This Useful Post:

    Artillian (02-24-2016)

  8. Remove Advertisements
    GreenTractorTalk.com
    Advertisements
     

  9. Top | #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Online
    08-11-2019 @ 08:38 PM
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    311
    Thanks
    25
    Thanked 51 Times in 36 Posts
    A 3 series won't be happening any time soon. I need to fit on a 48" wide sidewalk for snow removal. If I ever move away from sidewalk land a 3 series with a cab would be nice.
    I'm thinking of the 3000 lb. frame as a way to get the hitch receiver without a separate adapter. Looks like it would be a few $ less that way also but at the loss of a few lbs. lifting capacity.
    2005 - JD 4110, 54" front blade, 47" snow blower
    2004 - JD X595, 54" front blade
    2000 - JD 4100, 410 FEL

  10. Top | #5
    GTT Vendor Artillian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,527
    Thanks
    515
    Thanked 584 Times in 251 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by eastcreek View Post
    A 3 series won't be happening any time soon. I need to fit on a 48" wide sidewalk for snow removal. If I ever move away from sidewalk land a 3 series with a cab would be nice.
    I'm thinking of the 3000 lb. frame as a way to get the hitch receiver without a separate adapter. Looks like it would be a few $ less that way also but at the loss of a few lbs. lifting capacity.
    Your observations are spot on. The hitch receiver is a brand new addition and could only be added to the heavy duty pallet fork frames as the 2300lb frames don't have any space for it. They truly are made as light as possible!

    For anyone wanting the receiver option, regardless of tractor size, the heavy duty frame is now the way to go as we now have it rated for use with the lighter duty forks, derating the set as a whole.

    For those who don't have a big need for the receiver, they can save weight and some cost by staying with the 2300 lb frame. The Receiver Adapter will still be available, but in the end it will cost more than the heavy duty frame with the receiver built in.
    rtgt likes this.
    Tractor Attachments Maximized for Versatility
    www.ARTILLIAN.com
    Email: [email protected]

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Artillian For This Useful Post:

    eastcreek (02-24-2016)

  12. Top | #6
    rtgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last Online
    Today @ 12:12 AM
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    6,340
    Thanks
    1,774
    Thanked 1,126 Times in 798 Posts
    We are only talking about 18 pounds.

    I don't think that is gonna make that much difference.

    If the receiver is an option you want and plan to use it is pretty easy to just put the receiver in....

    So easy that a Kubota guy can do it.
    Artillian and 56FordGuy like this.
    Taking the easy way is what makes rivers and men crooked.

    3039R, H160 FEL, 375A Backhoe, Artillian Grapple & Forks
    Z915E
    XUV560

  13. Top | #7
    GTT Vendor Artillian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,527
    Thanks
    515
    Thanked 584 Times in 251 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rtgt View Post

    So easy that a Kubota guy can do it.
    Just remember to use a SQUARE ball mount. The ROUND ball mounts won't fit in there. Just a little help for the Kubota guys....
    dieselshadow, 56FordGuy and rtgt like this.
    Tractor Attachments Maximized for Versatility
    www.ARTILLIAN.com
    Email: [email protected]

  14. Remove Advertisements
    GreenTractorTalk.com
    Advertisements
     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •