Mid-nineties Ford F150/250 questions
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Mid-nineties Ford F150/250 questions

  1. Top | #1
    sbussell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    12-30-2018 @ 05:54 PM
    Location
    Sandown, NH
    Posts
    210
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts

    Mid-nineties Ford F150/250 questions

    Son is looking for a truck for daily driver. He likes the mid-nineties "square" body style. Looked at a 1996 F250 "heavy duty" but guy told him was not best truck for daily use as it had heavy rear end and transmission and was meant for towing.
    Is there an F250 from that time frame that is NOT "heavy duty". Are trucks of this era prone to frame rust? I know they are prone to rusting over the rear wheels and rear cab corners. Appreciate any tips and insight from the Ford guys. Thanks.
    Steve

    John Deere 1025r FiLB, with 53" bucket, 54" mower (sold), (sold) Imatch Quick Hitch, (sold)Frontier RB2060L and Ken's Bolt on Grab Hooks (x2), HLA 1500 Snowpush.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    GreenTractorTalk.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. Top | #2
    56FordGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:09 PM
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    10,028
    Thanks
    482
    Thanked 1,658 Times in 1,088 Posts
    The 96-97 F-250 heavy duty is the same as the previous years back to 92. They added the heavy duty badge to differentiate from the 97 F-150 which had already switched to the new body style. In 97-98 you could get a "light duty" 250, it was basically an F-150.

    They're good trucks, fine for daily driving if you can afford the gas. Depending on what engine it has you probably won't get over 15 empty and single digits towing if it has a gas engine.

    I just bought a 97 250 a few months ago, they're great trucks. It's certainly going to replace my 01 as a daily driver and maybe replace it entirely.
    mjncad and pcabe5 like this.
    -Blake

    Your mileage may vary.

    JD 6410
    Some other stuff

    YouTube- Life in Wyoming

  4. Top | #3
    dzldanz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Last Online
    04-18-2019 @ 07:01 AM
    Location
    Ottawa,Stittsville,Ontario
    Posts
    404
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by 56FordGuy View Post
    The 96-97 F-250 heavy duty is the same as the previous years back to 92. They added the heavy duty badge to differentiate from the 97 F-150 which had already switched to the new body style. In 97-98 you could get a "light duty" 250, it was basically an F-150.

    They're good trucks, fine for daily driving if you can afford the gas. Depending on what engine it has you probably won't get over 15 empty and single digits towing if it has a gas engine.

    I just bought a 97 250 a few months ago, they're great trucks. It's certainly going to replace my 01 as a daily driver and maybe replace it entirely.
    If it's a rear wheel drive you could possibly at a reasonable cost switch the rear axle ratio to a more economical one.
    The E4 OD automatics were troublesome when hauling heavy behind a diesel. Hard on torque converters.
    But my experience was with E-350's
    pcabe5 likes this.
    Current: 3320 HST cab with 59" front blower, Hydraulic chute deflector, Vertical Exhaust, Front Fenders,
    Grooved and loaded Front and Rear R-4's
    External Mirrors, Jensen Bluetooth Radio / Headset. Front Hydraulics
    Whelen warning lights, JD366 front blade
    Gone: X595 with heated cozy cab,stainless vertical exhaust

  5. Remove Advertisements
    GreenTractorTalk.com
    Advertisements
     

  6. Top | #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    09-15-2019 @ 06:59 PM
    Location
    Shenandoah Valley of VA
    Posts
    358
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts
    Your son would be fine with an F250 or 350, as long as he could afford the gas and didn't mind the rougher ride. I'll take a 250 or a 350 everyday, over a half ton (I've owned them all, and the 250 and 350 will simply do more work, and they have heavier components).
    The frames are not prone to rust, other than surface rust, or any other channel frame. The key is that they are c-channel, not boxed.
    In the series trucks that you are looking at, rust is prone in the rear fender wells (double walled and holds moisture), the rear cab corners (especially on the extended cabs), and behind the front tires, in the fender corners. Otherwise, they are good, solid, reliable, fairly easy to work on trucks.
    Last edited by hodge; 01-16-2017 at 08:00 AM.
    pcabe5 and 56FordGuy like this.
    Romans 1:16 "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ..."

  7. Top | #5
    sbussell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    12-30-2018 @ 05:54 PM
    Location
    Sandown, NH
    Posts
    210
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts
    Thanks Blake. So the light duty F250 would not have the "heavy duty" under the F250 badge?
    pcabe5 likes this.
    Steve

    John Deere 1025r FiLB, with 53" bucket, 54" mower (sold), (sold) Imatch Quick Hitch, (sold)Frontier RB2060L and Ken's Bolt on Grab Hooks (x2), HLA 1500 Snowpush.

  8. Top | #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    09-15-2019 @ 06:59 PM
    Location
    Shenandoah Valley of VA
    Posts
    358
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sbussell View Post
    Thanks Blake. So the light duty F250 would not have the "heavy duty" under the F250 badge?
    The light duty F250, put out in 97, will be the same body style as the newly released F150 (Heritage body), with a larger rear axle than the F150, and 7 lug wheels. Ford still built the square-body F250 and 350 for 97, skipped 98, and released the Super Duty in 99.

    That light duty F250 only came with the 5.4, and an automatic (in the 4WD's).
    pcabe5 and 56FordGuy like this.
    Romans 1:16 "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ..."

  9. Top | #7
    sbussell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    12-30-2018 @ 05:54 PM
    Location
    Sandown, NH
    Posts
    210
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by hodge View Post
    The light duty F250, put out in 97, will be the same body style as the newly released F150 (Heritage body), with a larger rear axle than the F150, and 7 lug wheels. Ford still built the square-body F250 and 350 for 97, skipped 98, and released the Super Duty in 99.

    That light duty F250 only came with the 5.4, and an automatic (in the 4WD's).
    Thanks hodge. Great info.
    pcabe5 likes this.
    Steve

    John Deere 1025r FiLB, with 53" bucket, 54" mower (sold), (sold) Imatch Quick Hitch, (sold)Frontier RB2060L and Ken's Bolt on Grab Hooks (x2), HLA 1500 Snowpush.

  10. Top | #8
    56FordGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 02:09 PM
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    10,028
    Thanks
    482
    Thanked 1,658 Times in 1,088 Posts
    Hodge nailed it.

    What I like about the 90's F series is that they were popular enough, there are still a ton of them on the road. If your son does his own mechanic work, parts are readily available from stores and a lot of things are dirt cheap in junkyards. They haven't hit the age where salvage parts are hard to get. They're easy to work on and don't require much of special tools. While most of the automotive world went to OBD II in 96, these trucks did not. They're still an OBD I system that doesn't require a special scan tool. If your son doesn't do his own mechanic work, every mechanic out there has worked on one of these trucks and knows about them.

    Compared to a newer truck they're lacking some creature comforts and the turning radius could be better but they're solid, well built trucks.
    pcabe5 and Superglidesport like this.
    -Blake

    Your mileage may vary.

    JD 6410
    Some other stuff

    YouTube- Life in Wyoming

  11. Top | #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last Online
    01-16-2017 @ 02:18 PM
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    754
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 83 Times in 76 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sbussell View Post
    Thanks Blake. So the light duty F250 would not have the "heavy duty" under the F250 badge?
    The light duty/heavy duty/super duty only applies to '97 & '99 vintage F-250/350's. My 1996 just says F-250, XLT, and POWERSTROKE. It was a late '96 model year build too, built first week of June, maybe second week. Was delivered to dealership June 23, '96.My '96 has been a great truck over it's almost 21 years and 302,000 miles. It was my daily driver for it's first 9-10 years putting 32,000-34,000 miles a year on it. It's a regular cab long box 4wd with manual 5-speed ZF transmission and 3.55 gears. I averaged almost 19 mpg of fuel when it was my daily driver, and I ran 70-72 mph all the time. If I'd have run 60-65 I would have averaged over 20 mpg easily.Many people talk bad about the Twin Traction Beam frt axle. I had a '78 F-150 with a Dana 44 monogram frt axle. I was lucky to get 25,000 miles to a set of tires. With my '96 TTB I got about 93,000 on the factory Steeltex Firestone's, got 127,000 miles on the Firestone Wilderness ATX's and have 82,000 on my Bridgestone Dueler AT's.My buddy had a '92 F-250 4wd w/351 Windsor, 5-spd manual and 3.55's, running 65-70 he'd get 10-12 mpg. Only other engine option on a 4wd was the 460. I "think" the 300-6 was standard on a 2wd F-250, but don't expect more than 14 mpg from that combination. I wore out two SWB reg cab F-150 4wd's and best I ever got was 14 mpg. Both trucks were basic, creeper lo 4-speed, just PS/PB, no AC, Tilt, or cruise. They could have used an overdrive bad but neither had an over abundance of power. SON had a '93 F-150 Lightning pickup for 12 years, tuned 351 Windsor, E4OD, 4.10 gears and best I could ever get was 14 mpg @65 mph, SON got 16 mpg once with his tires aired up to 55-60 psi, and drafting a semi at 70-75 mph.

  12. Top | #10
    89420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Last Online
    08-06-2019 @ 01:00 PM
    Location
    st.louis
    Posts
    568
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 55 Times in 52 Posts
    ive worked on a few for people. im not a ford lover at all but i do like the LOOK of the OBS trucks but like the gm's of that vintage better. the ttb front end sucks. i would look for a f350 which has soild front axle (4wd) the steering on the fords are bad real bad zero feel for the road and over boosted.

    it all depends on what he plans to use it for. sport truck,work truck towing rig,grocery getter ect

    my dad has owned a 01 2wd 3.0 ranger since new that thing has been a big pile. but he will go down with the ship he dosent get rid of nothing. even though at best it has no power and returns him 16mpg. i tell him he could have a more capable full size for the same mpg

    as far as the fords i cant remember if all the OBS truck used speed density efi or mass air. if they are speed density not to much you can do for building more power with the factory efi. if thats a concern/goal..

    i would probally look for a late 80's f350 with a idi 7.3 or even a 6.9 cheap and would be fun to work on/modify but dont go to far they aint no cummins
    Last edited by 89420; 01-16-2017 at 03:34 PM.
    1935 jd model D
    65 110 rf
    77 jd 80 cart
    83 420 rear pto, 3 point hitch
    88 332 46"deck s
    89 420 60" deck
    89 318
    jd #8 chainsaw (remington)
    2)jd 35ev chainsaws (echo)
    jd 50v chainsaw (echo
    jd 60v chainsaw (echo)
    jd 70v chainsaw (echo) sold
    jd 80ev chainsaw (echo)
    jd cs40 chainsaw (efco 940)
    husqvarna 240 chainsaw
    husqvarna 372xp chainsaw
    husqvarna 455 chainsaw
    2)dolmar 117 chainsaws
    dolmar 100 chainsaw

  13. Remove Advertisements
    GreenTractorTalk.com
    Advertisements
     

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •