That's what they had to do to make a loader designed for a sub compact tractor work on a compact tractor. I guess they didn't want to design an manufacture a loader for only one model of tractor 😠.
It would be interesting to see just how different the frame mounts would have been, etc. to get the 220R onto the 2025r. Also, the overall machine height of the 2032r and the 2038r is quite a bit taller than the 2025r tractor is.
It would be insightful, Having a 220R and a 120R FEL parked directly next to one another, to see the differences in the height of the parked loaders and to highlight any differences in the shape and size of the boom arms, etc. The 220R has to have a greater range of movement than does the 120R simply to be able to reach its full lift and dump height as well as put down pressure and raise the front end of the taller machines.
Also, when you look at the number of machines sold, the 1 series clearly sells more machines than does the larger 2 series machines.
When you combine the production and sales volumes of the 2025r with those of the other 2 series machines (2032r and 2038r) suddenly the total number of 220R loaders would likely be similar to the 120R loader production for the 1 series.
It makes one wonder if they had made the 220R fit the 2025r Gen 2 machines, the production volumes of the 220R would then probably be more similar to the production numbers of the 120R and that would help with lowering the cost to produce the loader and sell it. Or on the flip side, simply increase the profit margin on the 220r units when sold.
There are a lot of decisions made regarding these machines which it would be interesting to hear the reasons why the decisions were made as they were.