Ahhhh. Nothing like the smell of a new tractor....:yahoo:
Sent from my phone using Tapatalk.
Sent from my phone using Tapatalk.
I would think it's a calculated figure based on the Engine RPM's and the drive gear ratio to the rear PTO and the front PTO. If the tractor has two or three ground speed ranges, that could explain why they don't display Ground speed.... Just a thought, I've no personel experience. Nice Tractor and mower for sure.........~ScottyGreat pics and video.
The rpm readout is an interesting feature. Wonder if it is a true readout or just a representation from the engine rpm?
I noticed that right away as well. Here is what a 2011 1026r looks like for those who may not know yet.Thanks for the pics and videos, great! :thumbup1gif:
One thing I noticed is that you have a lower idle speed. My 1026R idles at above 1550 rpm, and the manual confirms it. It appears that your machine idles at just below 1200 rpm, which is really NICE.
I've read that others have questioned why the idle was so high on the new 10xx series, do you think Deere has changed something with the 2012 units?
I'm in agreement here with you. I too have a post S/N 210000 (built on January 9th, so they must have been using up the 200000 parts on mine :laughWell, the videos have me wondering if JD has changed the max engine RPM as well. If you indeed were at full throttle, it appears in all of the videos that you are maxing out at 3100 RPM. This is also reflected in the PTO RPM's because you did not reach 540 on the rear PTO or 2100 on the Mid PTO. Would like to hear from anyone else with the 2012 1026R to see if this is across the board or if this machine needs tweaking to get the RPM's correctly adjusted.
Well, the videos have me wondering if JD has changed the max engine RPM as well. If you indeed were at full throttle, it appears in all of the videos that you are maxing out at 3100 RPM. This is also reflected in the PTO RPM's because you did not reach 540 on the rear PTO or 2100 on the Mid PTO. Would like to hear from anyone else with the 2012 1026R to see if this is across the board or if this machine needs tweaking to get the RPM's correctly adjusted.
I never gave the throttle issue anymore thought as everything seemed to be working fine. Well, it was a long time coming but I did discover why my engine RPMs were lower than other 1 series owners.I'm in agreement here with you. I too have a post S/N 210000 (built on January 9th, so they must have been using up the 200000 parts on mine :laugh, but it does not have the RIO nor this slick RPM in the LCD readout when the PTO is engaged. My maintenance manual shows that the engine RPM's should be between 1575 and 3370 +/50, so me thinks that something is not right here since he is not obtaining the correct PTO speeds and his engine RPM's are lower.