The cab will feel tight getting in or out but sitting and operating you will have plenty of room.
It’s not a five, but it will handle the brush hog fine.
It’s not a five, but it will handle the brush hog fine.
Yes, the 7ft and larger brush hogs are cat 2 as is my 10ft 3pt Rhino. However, it now connects to my cat1 iMatch just fine. Just a little mod work and it works fine. My 8ft box blade is also cat 2, but it now connects just fine to my cat 1 iMatch. My 10ft Rhino brush hog weighs 1750#. It lifts it, but gets a little light in the front. Definitely have to have the bucket on the loader, which is usually not on there unless I am using it. I roaded it about 15 miles each way recently that way, but probably could have used a little dirt in the bucket for additional front ballast. The Rhino is a light duty brush hog. If it were a JD MX10, I would have to use it in 2pt mode as it weighs considerably more.I was thinking 8ft brush cutter like an mx8, where A 4066R could work with the pull type, but the 3pt version is cat 2 or cat 3. Just too heavy for a 4066R, The 4066R has a cat 1 3pt.
Exactly, I am a firm believer the more tractors the better.Funny, I wish I had my old OOS 5310 back so I would have 2 tractors. So if it were me I would keep the 2 tractors.
I think even if you can hook it up, I personally would still rather operate a 7 ft or 8 ft brush cutter with a 5 series over a 4 series if given the choice.Yes, the 7ft and larger brush hogs are cat 2 as is my 10ft 3pt Rhino. However, it now connects to my cat1 iMatch just fine. Just a little mod work and it works fine. My 8ft box blade is also cat 2, but it now connects just fine to my cat 1 iMatch. My 10ft Rhino brush hog weighs 1750#. It lifts it, but gets a little light in the front. Definitely have to have the bucket on the loader, which is usually not on there unless I am using it. I roaded it about 15 miles each way recently that way, but probably could have used a little dirt in the bucket for additional front ballast. The Rhino is a light duty brush hog. If it were a JD MX10, I would have to use it in 2pt mode as it weighs considerably more.
Dave
The problem is that most of us can only afford one tractor, so we have to find one of those "one size fits all".I think even if you can hook it up, I personally would still rather operate a 7 ft or 8 ft brush cutter with a 5 series over a 4 series if given the choice.
Now my 4066R has been a favorite tractor of mine, mine is a 2019 bought new 2 years ago, just hit 200 hours this week.
She gets plenty of use, and I still really love my 4066R, ordered a new MSL loader for it, a few weeks ago. I have no plans of letting her go anytime in the near future.
Deere would have to come out with a larger cab E-hydro trans tractor, 4 or 5 series to make me want to trade or upgrade my 4066R.
I just know I would find having 2 tractors vs 1, just more functional and or also more appealing to me.
Nothing at all wrong with anyone looking or wanting to buy a 4066R, I know first hand it is an awesome machine.
True, I get that.The problem is that most of us can only afford one tractor, so we have to find one of those "one size fits all".
Sent from my Samsung Note using Tapatalk Pro
I only have the bucket or forks on the loader if they are going to be used. Otherwise, there is nothing on the front of the loader, such as when I am mowing the yard. The 10ft 3pt brush hog is heavy enough that I do have to have the bucket on the loader for front ballast.I have considered it and looked at them however I greatly prefer hydro tranny for loader work. I bought the 2wd cab specifically for big open field mowing which it does well. Also the bucket is so far in front of machine on 5 series it really limits visibility. Could be just me but if I’m using a loader on an incline or around trees I want hydro.
Yep, there seems to be several members here, myself included, that would love to see Deere come out with something like that, either a new larger cab 4R or a 5 series with an e-hydro trans option.This discussion leads me to the conclusion the Deere needs to market a 5R series tractor with a hydrostatic transmission. If they could increase the power to just over 70 hp but keep the 4R powertrain I think they would have a very marketable tractor. It would ovbiously be more money than the 4R tractor but the larger cab with better visibility and function, yet still keeping the hydro ease of use, I think would attract buyers. Now, the price difference between a 4R hydro and a 5R hydro would be a factor but the small cab on the 4R seems to be a common complaint.