I'd go for a 2038. I have s 2032, and some steep hills, would go for the turbo if I had to do it again.
Agreed they all should have 3 speeds.The 2038R is still limited to a 2 range transmission. It’s also physically the same size as a 3R.
I have owned a 2038R, all be it not for very long, I really simply prefer a 3R Hands down over a large frame 2R.
‘The 3R has a tighter turning radius then the 2038, 3Rs have 3 range transmissions, just more capable in every way.
IMO really is worth the few extra bucks over the 2038R. Just my opinion having owned both.
Agreed.The 2038R is still limited to a 2 range transmission. It’s also physically the same size as a 3R.
I have owned a 2038R, all be it not for very long, I really simply prefer a 3R Hands down over a large frame 2R.
‘The 3R has a tighter turning radius then the 2038, 3Rs have 3 range transmissions, just more capable in every way.
IMO really is worth the few extra bucks over the 2038R. Just my opinion having owned both.
I agree, putting the Turbo on the 2025R would be the least expensive way to go, to try and accomplish a lot of what was mentioned by the OP.If you add a turbo to your current tractor ... You don't get the extra emissions stuff the factory higher HP tractors have to add on ... So, if you want to stay away from the emissions, either bump up your current tractor, live with slower speed up hills, or trailer it ...
I'd turbo it! Of course I paid cash for my tractor, if your financing it you may want to reconsider?
X2 on every single word of this post!!The 2038R is still limited to a 2 range transmission. It’s also physically the same size as a 3R.
I have owned a 2038R, all be it not for very long, I really simply prefer a 3R Hands down over a large frame 2R.
‘The 3R has a tighter turning radius then the 2038, 3Rs have 3 range transmissions, just more capable in every way.
IMO really is worth the few extra bucks over the 2038R. Just my opinion having owned both.