.
Ridiculously expensive for what it is.

 

The promised single point connector is now available for the 1-series.

You can get it here with free shipping.

John Deere Single Point Hydraulic Connector Kit - BXX10283

www.greenpartstore.com

The price is higher than we expected. However, this will REALLY help when it comes time to remove the loader.

Tim

Your loader must be a lot harder to hook up and unhook than mine is. (200CX)

For what we (tractor owners) pay for these machines, that should be standard equipment with a loader package; and "free shipping" is hidden in the cost of the product.. Seems like every year Deere adds lots of stuff they call 'convenience items', like drink holders, fender mounted work lights, etc., that could be easily bought generically, but leave the really helpful things an extra cost item, and do I mean extra cost.

 

Well, it's "free" on the Kubota BX's loader. But I'm looking at the 1025R, as it bests the BX in FEL capacity and drive-over deck functionality--and that's despite my love for my Kubota B3000. YMMV.

 

As I mentioned in the other post about this, Its not for me, so I didn't order it (2038) but I'm glad Deere is offering it for those that want it. More choice is more better!

 

Thanks for sharing, will we see a video of it?Would be interesting to see how it works.

 

Too rich for my blood. That and its not a very elegant looking solition. Looks like more of an afterthought. I guess because it is.

Are the hoses on the loader frame replaced in this kit. There are 90 degree elbows on both ends now? I have the older H120 so not sure. Could be the reason for the higher than expected cost?

The single point will certainly be easier but if your swapping out your loader enough to justify this you probably have gotten good at manipulating the stock connectors. I know I have.

Also what about when you want to use an attachment other than a FEL. Do you need to buy a top half for each implement? Starting to get really expensive for guys with plows and snowblowers not to mention brooms.

It sticks up too far. Just asking to get whacked by a branch or vine.

Sorry to rain on the parade but I expected better out of Deere. Hopefully when they go through the next major redesign of the one series tractor they will come up with a better integrated solution. That would’ve been the time to do it instead of this half cocked add on.

 

Also what about when you want to use an attachment other than a FEL. Do you need to buy a top half for each implement? Starting to get really expensive for guys with plows and snowblowers not to mention brooms.

I was just at my dealer today talking about this. The answer is Yup, you'll have to have another top half for each implement, or transfer the top to another implement.

If you run a FEL only and have a physical condition, then I could see the benefit after swallowing the cost. A top half for each implement really makes it difficult to justify. My 2 cents.

 

I called and they referred me to a guy in another department. If you need to call just ask for a guy named Ben Dover.

 

Hahaha. .... thats funny!

 

Everything on the 1 series is an afterthought it seems. Cab, loader, quick connect, its all just patched in over the last kit. Nothing is purpose built and its all about how they can cobble together a kit from existing stock to make it do something else. Hard pass from me for 900 bucks.

 

As a Mauser cab owner, Im not sure I would call it an afterthought. Its probably the nicest sub-compact cab on the market. Have you seen the garbage that is the curtis advantage cabs?

 

It's a beautiful piece of equipment that would make an annoying and messy task clean and fast. That convenience is not worth $800+ for me so I wouldn't do it. But I can see this being a great thing for people that have physical disabilities or unlimited funding for cool new toys.

 

If an operator is consistently taking the loader off and on several times a week I can see where the single point connection would be a nice time saver.

 

I have to laugh...
People BEGGED fo this option for years, and now that it's available no one likes it because it is perceived to "cost too much".

 

Right. Most already knew what the option cost was for other tractors so there was no reason to think the 1-series cost would be much different.

 

I might have sprung for that on a brand new machine on 0% financing. It would be easier to spend someone else's money on that.

 

When I was comparing tractors the question came up, for instance you get a broom that as standard quick connect hose couplers. How does that adapt to the single point?

 

My dealer added extra female couplers down low for his customers to still use the standard quick Coupler for there snow Blowers I believe On the 2032R /2038R

With My Tektie Cab On My 2025R I would consider them But I need to add the OEM 3rd function kit Because I currently have the Artillian 3rd Function Kit which would Interfere with single Point connection. To me anything under $1,000 is Not Bad Price

 

I’ll put that on my bucket list for my “Forever Tractor”. Sadly it’s not available as LipStick On My Pig (2305) which I seem to have had now forever. It may be a handy thing as my arthritis will be pretty bad by the time I start working on that bucket list of essentials on the next one.

 

I did a post on the connectors....if they had only spaced the fitting out another 1/2" where you could get you finger for release. I'm working on a couple of tools to assist in the coupling and releasing. I'll let the group know how they turn out with some pics. Plan on working on this weekend. It's unfortunate about the cost of some these add on and the coupler is cost prohibited in my opinion. But like I say if they had spaced the couplers out one could attach/unattach much easier. I may also look into my hyraulic shop for some extensions. This is one of the most senseless designs I've ever seen.

 

Adding 4 of the 12" hydraulic line extenders sure makes hooking and unhooking the FEL much easier, especially for those who have a cab and the female ports are tucked up under the cab edge. The extenders also provide more options and allows you to recover a loader which might have "collapsed" down due to loss of cylinder pressure, etc. by being able to connect the lines and draw the loader into position.

Just recently, I was just thinking about the "PTO Quick Connect" when I was struggling to get the PTO shaft connected on my Frontier RC2048 Mower.....and the thought of spending $375 or whatever that cost motivated me to resume trying harder......I guess the alternative of spending $900 for the single hydraulic connection point would also motivate me to resume struggling with the hydraulic connectors........which the issue is largely solved by the line extenders......

I certainly can understand for those GTT members who have a physical limitation which makes the connection more challenging. It's also a good idea to keep the hydraulic pressure relief tool from Kenny in the I Match Chain boxes, just in case you need to release the line pressure.

Conveniently, both the pressure relief tool and the I Match chain boxes are available from this place called "Ken's Bolt on Hooks", and he can even hook you up with the custom made FEL hydraulic line extenders. Great prices, fast, friendly service. What more could one ask for?

 

Interesting, it says for use with the 120R FEL, but says nothing about the H120 loader. Wonder if there is some reason why it wouldn't adapt to the H120 loader? If it does fit, Green parts or Deere should update their listing to clarify the point as they make a point of how its designed for the 1e, 1R and 2025R machines...............

 

I'm wondering the same thing. I'm guessing it's just mounting bracket. The rest is just plumbing. Any modification or custom bracketry would have to be pretty percise and pretty stout though in order for everything to line-up and tighten down.

 

For someone who purchases a new machine and includes this option as part of the package then it's a simple financial consideration. Especially if the dealer offers a significant discount to the entire purchase.

For someone else who may have physical challenges then it's a valuable and easily justifiable investment.

As another poster mentioned for someone who frequently removes and attaches the loader it's easily cost justified.

Like almost anything it falls into one of two categories. "Want" VS "Need?"

 

I purchased the kit that is offered for the large 2 series after owning the tractor for a yr. I found myself having to fight with the hydraulic connectors every time I tried to re connect. The coupler's were too close together and trying to slide back the slippery collars to re connect was frustrating. And don't get me started on lines that are pressurized because the loader was sitting in the sun while I was mowing. Now you got to crack the lines, get oil everywhere, and fight the slippery collars that are 2mm apart.

Now with the single point it's not an issue. I haven't had to crack or depressurize any lines or get a drop of oil on me. Faster connect under pressure single point. It's well worth the price. If you have more than four lines you may can find a unit that works for you. Faster offers a huge range of connectivity.

Faster | MultiFaster | Multiconnections

www.fastercouplings.com

 

Sullybear...where do you get the line extenders or do you have them made up?

 

As a middle ground solution, anyone looked into swapping to flat face couplers? Kubota just went to those for their larger BH hydro connect. I remember using them in high school as a volunteer firefighter; real slick hardware. Still need to slide-to-unlock to disconnect, but connect is just press on, as I recall. I know they aren't cheap, but I was ideally browsing a few places online, and the fittings, while not cheap, don't look to cost nearly a grand, either. Plus the implementation would certainly be cleaner than the mess JD has going on here.

Figure Flat face does away with the need for fiddling with dust connectors, as both sides self seal, so that's another plus too.

 

As a middle ground solution, anyone looked into swapping to flat face couplers?

Figure Flat face does away with the need for fiddling with dust connectors, as both sides self seal, so that's another plus too.

As long as you can find a female flat faced coupler that will mate up to the existing hard line and mount in the existing SCV bracket via a snap ring, there shouldn't be any issues. You have a lot more leeway with the male couplers.

 

Well, after seeing the kit and the installation on TTWT, my opinion has changed quite a bit. I had no idea so much was involved and how may quality parts are included and how extensive the kit is. Although, at present, I don't have the need or desire for it, I can see the value in the kit.
It definitely looks better than the system that is used on the Kubota. I looked at that once and immediately wandered how long it will last.

Special thanks for Tim for another excellent video and demonstration. He is the reason I bought my 1025R.

 

I ordered one today from them using TTWT! Thanks! Your video helped point out some places I might also have some minor trouble since I also have the 3rd function.

 

Thanks Justin!

 

Here is our review and install video discussed above.

Single Point Hydraulic Connector; Deere 1023e/1025r/2025r

 

Certainly for some, this kit is great!

I was hoping (and thought) that this single point connection would be a little cleaner, and not sticking up in the way with the large bracket with more hoses and you're still using the pioneer couplers. The Kubota def looks cleaner.

I by no means think this is a terrible upgrade so don't get me wrong. For me, I just have to justify the 846 dollars. Thanks TTWT for the great vid!

 

If Deere were to make this standard (like Kubota) they should/could lower the cost, due to the volume they would sell. Also cost to Deere of four male/female couplers currently used could be deducted from the price
IIRC there was thread years ago where someone found a JD bundle for the multi coupler that was very low. Then JD quickly upped the price.
Both my tractors have them (the older version) first offered (IIRC) on for the JD 640 loader